Current Benchmark Verified

94.3% Fewer Tokens,
All the Context

Current benchmark: 1,677 decisions in 243,607 tokens for CLAUDE.md vs 13,852 tokens for Continuity. 94.3% token savings and 17.6× efficiency. CLAUDE.md hits the 200K context limit around 1376 decisions while Continuity keeps working.

Calculate Your SavingsSee How We Tested

✓ Mathematical proof included • ✓ CLAUDE.md breaks around 1376 decisions • ✓ O(1) vs O(n) complexity advantage

95.7%
Token Savings
336,704 → 14,472 tokens
23.3×
Efficiency Multiplier
O(1) vs O(n) complexity
1,677
Decisions Encoded
145.3 tokens per decision
$414+
Monthly Savings
At 600 sessions/month

Calculate Your Savings

Based on the current benchmark snapshot: 1,677 decisions and 600 sessions/month

Calculate Your Savings

100
10 requests500 requests
Monthly Savings
$96.67
vs current benchmark baseline
Annual Savings
$1160.04
First year total
Net Monthly
$+87.67
After $9 subscription
Return on Investment
+974%
✅ Profitable from day one
Token Savings
95.7%
Verified against the current benchmark snapshot
Benchmark cost without Continuity:$101.01/month
Benchmark cost with Continuity:$13.34/month
Your Total Savings:$96.67/month
Verified against current benchmark data (1,650 decisions)
See full methodology →•Run test yourself

Savings at Different Usage Levels

Typical developer usage: 50-600 requests per month

Sessions/MonthMonthly SavingsAnnual SavingsROI vs $9 Plan
50$34.46$413.56+283%
100$68.93$827.12+666%
200$137.85$1654.24+1432%
600$413.56$4962.72+4495%

Savings start immediately - at 600 sessions/month, the benchmark saves $580.02/month before the $9 plan cost is subtracted.

Mathematical Proof of Efficiency

Current benchmark analysis of CLAUDE.md scaling limits vs Continuity's O(1) search-based retrieval

Real CLAUDE.md Analysis

Actual production CLAUDE.md file with 1,677 logged decisions. Base instructions: 5,277 tokens. Average per decision: 142.1 tokens.

System breaks at about 1376 decisions when CLAUDE.md exceeds the 200K token context limit. At 1,677 decisions it needs 243,607 tokens.

O(n) Scaling Problem

CLAUDE.md grows linearly: 243,607 tokens at 1,677 decisions. Every session loads all decisions regardless of relevance.

Cost per session: $0.731. Unusable beyond about 1376 decisions.

O(1) Search Retrieval

Continuity loads only relevant decisions via semantic search. Total: 13,852 tokens at the current benchmark.

Cost per session: $0.042. Scales with retrieval budget.

Mathematical Proof

Complexity analysis: O(1) vs O(n). Continuity maintains constant retrieval costs while CLAUDE.md grows linearly past the context window.

17.6× efficiency multiplier. Search-based retrieval remains the durable option as projects grow.

O(1) vs O(n): The Fundamental Difference

O(n)
CLAUDE.md Approach
Loads all 1,677 decisions every session
243,607 tokens • Breaks around 1376 decisions
O(1)
Continuity Search
Loads only relevant decisions
13,852 tokens • Scales with retrieval budget

The more decisions you log, the worse CLAUDE.md performs. Continuity maintains constant efficiency.

Real-World Comparison at Scale

Production CLAUDE.md with 1,677 decisions vs Continuity's search-based retrieval

CLAUDE.md (O(n) Growth)

Tokens:243,607
Decisions:1,677 (all loaded)
Cost per Session:$0.731
Breaking Point:~1376 decisions

Continuity (O(1) Search)

Tokens:13,852
Decisions:1,677 (3 queries × 15 results)
Cost per Session:$0.042
Breaking Point:None (scales with retrieval budget)

Savings Per Session

229,755
Tokens Saved
94.3% reduction
17.6×
Efficiency Multiplier
O(1) vs O(n) advantage
$0.69
Saved Per Session
At the current benchmark

See the Full Analysis

Complete mathematical proof, current benchmark analysis, and scaling comparison available on GitHub.

View Mathematical ProofGet Started with Continuity